Lockdown is the Latest Dodgy Export from China, and its Free

"China released the coronavirus sometime in late 2019. By early March China was pushing countries around the globe to put in place economic shutdowns similar to what the CCP did in Wuhan. They clearly wanted the world to suffer economically from the virus. One individual on Twitter put together a lengthy Twitter thread outlining the efforts China took to ensure the rest of the world would participate in shutdowns like China put in place in Hubei Province."(1)

The person who put this twitter thread together was Michael P Senger.(2) This article consists of all of his comments from that thread together with some of the images he provides. The location of the original thread is given in the Footnotes. I will add a few of my own comment in italics to distinguish them from his statements. All emphasis added is mine.

1/5 This New York Times article by @paulmozur is a smoking gun on the genesis of the coronavirus lockdowns.(3) According to the article, the CCP launched a massive social media campaign in ITALY to advertise its coronavirus lockdown measures in early March.

Behind China’s Twitter Campaign, a Murky Supporting Chorus
Swarms of accounts are amplifying Beijing’s brash new messaging as the country tries to shape the global narrative about the coronavirus and much else. (nytimes.com)

This series of tweets proves that China has a central role in the New World Order. Almost as soon as Covid19 was detected in Wuhan what must have been a well-planned system we know as "lockdown" was put in place by the Chinese leadership. Not long afterwards they initiated a MASSIVE campaign on Twitter to most countries insisting that all other countries must follow their policy to defeat the supposedly deadly virus. They are clearly an integral part of the world-wide grab for power we see today. Virually all nation-states have followed the illegal, dangerous and totalitarian policies intended to bring in a one world government controlled by the super-rich through their banking monopoly, hedge funds, and their public institutions such as the central banks, the IMF, the World Bank, the UN and a multitute of NGOs, foundations, and think tanks. This take-over has been planned for at least 30 years. Its goal is to destroy the power of individual nation-states. Because of its ability to mobilize people, recources and finance independently of loans from banks, the modern nation-state is the only institution capable of defeating the power of monopoly finance capital.

2/5 The fact that CCP’s disinformation campaign focused on Italy is crucial. Italy was the first country outside China to lock down. The rest of the world followed Italy’s lead.

3/5 But CCP's campaign wasn't limited to Italy. The article states that this Tweet advertising China's lockdown policy to the world is fake. It has 142,000 likes. Tweets like this prove CCP was actively selling the world on Wuhan-style lockdowns in early March.

4/5 Next, if you search for the URL of that fake Tweet (https://twitter.com/manisha_kataki/status/1238007207700180992), you'll find it retweeted by many accounts around the world. Each account is suspicious—they Tweet incessantly about COVID until Floyd's death, then solely BLM.

This connection between the NWO lockdown policy and the Black Lives Matter movement needs to be discussed. What is the basis of the connection? We can see the connection in the next tweet.

5/5 The sheer scale of this operation and the number of accounts involved, and its influence around the world, is really remarkable. Thousands of accounts tweeting incessantly about COVID hysteria, then pivoting to incessant BLM and anti-police propaganda, in every country.

The ultimate goal of the BLM movement, other than totally disrupting the US just before the 2020 election, is to remove local and state control of police. The connection between this policy and the NWO has been clearly revealed in the Australian state of Victoria. As explained in another Australian Voice article, the police in Victoria have been "augmented" by what are in effect private security guards WHO TAKE ORDERS FROM LONDON, not the Victorian government.(4) Here we see the "world police force" of private security guards needed to protect the NWO. In the NWO EVERYTHING IS PRIVATE, owned and controlled by the institutions created by the super-rich for this purpose.

6/5 The day after @paulmozur's NYT article was published, @Twitter suspended over 170,000 fake Chinese accounts. But none of the fake accounts involved in the ring described above were suspended. This problem is much larger than Twitter acknowledges.

The globalist press in the US and UK constantly proclaim that Russia is improperly influencing the politics of these two countries. This seems to be a complete distraction. It is China that is influencing policies in the US, UK and around the world. These tweets prove its existence while the proof of Russian interference has no tangible existence outside of the media itself.

7/5 More than 50 NIH scientists fired due to China ties. Hundreds more under investigation. By co-opting scientists and academics while aggressively promoting lockdowns through social media propaganda, China made lockdown pseudoscience seem sound.

8/5 Though CCP's influence operations in media, politics, and academia were surreptitious, its stance in support of global adoption of COVID lockdowns was explicit. Here is China's foreign spokesperson promoting strict social distancing among children:

9/5 In speech this morning at @HudsonInstitute, @FBI director Chris Wray says CCP specifically approached local politicians to endorse its COVID lockdowns.

10/5 "in fact, we have heard from federal, state, and even local officials that Chinese diplomats are aggressively urging support for China’s handling of the COVID-19 crisis. Yes, this is happening at both the federal and state levels."

Here we see the direct influence by Chinese diplomats on all levels of US political life. No sign of the Russians, of course. So why is there no screaming from the media about Chinese influence? Could it be that they, like the Chinese government, are in on the NWO conspiracy as well?

11/5 This collage is a tiny sample of the fake accounts CCP used to popularize COVID lockdowns. In these Tweets, CCP sends its regards to the world by denigrating every other government in the world, using many dialects, and contrasting them with its authoritarian "success."

12/5 These Tweets were easily identified using leads in @paulmozur's NYT article. Here, hundreds of fake accounts whine about "washing their hands" while China locks down. Nearly identical Tweets are made in many languages. Fake Spanish Tweets—

13/5 Twitter responded the following day by saying they'd removed the 170,000 accounts in this campaign. But Twitter lied. These fake CCP accounts, and presumably hundreds of thousands of others, are still doing CCP's bidding.

14/5 In cooperation with FBI, National Science Foundation reports between 14-18 cases of undisclosed China financial ties. This is in addition to the 175 cases of undisclosed China financial ties earlier reported by the NIH, a much larger organization.

15/5 “Sweden—partly due to its own COVID-19 response—has been a prime target of a Chinese campaign portraying Western democracies as weak against the threat. Sweden is one of few countries that ordered no lockdown and put its faith in herd immunity.”

16/5 The fall that shut down the world. This video of a Wuhan man “falling dead” from COVID went viral in January. Farcical, in hindsight. (https://dailymail.co.uk/video/china/vi)

I don't wish to brag, but some of us could see this was fake at the time. Looking carefully I think you can see the man putting out his hands to break his fall. I assume we can say the same about the many other home-made videos that came out of China at the time. They were not showing up the government, but spreading the fake message of the danger of Covid19 to the world. I doubt that there has ever been such a sustained and wide-ranging campaign on Twitter!

17/ In CCP interview, Editor-in-Chief of Lancet praises CCP’s lockdowns: "not only the right thing to do, but it also showed other countries how they should respond in the face of such an acute threat. So, I think we have a great deal to thank China for"

Clearly the Lancet has sold out the people of the UK. This shows how extensive the planning and organization of this coup must have been in key counries like the UK. All the right people would have gone along with the plan or been replaced by people who would.

18/ @WHO was instrumental in pushing world leaders to adopt China's lockdowns and insisting lockdowns not be lifted until strict tracing criteria were met. Bruce Aylward is the same WHO leader who disconnected a live interview when asked about Taiwan.

The WHO and the IPCC have been some of the most active parts of the UN in pushing forward the NWO agenda. It is quite possible that when it was set up after WWII it was intended to be a vehicle for the West's imperial control of the world. Now countries like China and India are also present at the table, so it is the power of money rather than the power or this or that nation-state that we see in action. There still may be tensions, however. There is always the question: whose money? Don't let the massive coordination across the globe blind you to the fact that the people at the top are only unified by their greed. In "normal" nation-states, conflicts between different corporations over profits are often setteled by politics, although behing closed doors. There does not seem to be any recognized way that such conflicts can be resolved within the NWO. If politics does not work, then the only other solution is war.

19/ South Dakota Governor @govkristinoem famously refused to issue a state lockdown. Her decision didn't sit well with Beijing. CCP's army of fake accounts began filling her Twitter feed with abuse to punish her disobedience and pressure her to shut down her state.

20/ By contrast, the accounts heap praise on governors who tighten lockdowns, like Dan Andrews, gov of Victoria, Australia. Andrews' long-time staffer attended a high-level CCP academy. An MP leading Andrews' Belt & Road negotiations with Beijing lauded China's handling of COVID.

21/ @BorisJohnson initially opted for herd immunity. But on Mar 13, four days after Italy's lockdown, CCP began storming his feed, likening his plan to genocide. These words almost never appear in his feed before Mar 12. Tragically, the abuse worked, and UK locked down Mar 23.

22/ The bold-faced lie of lockdowns is "China controlled the virus." It's an obvious lie—China's data is manifestly forged. But CCP normalizes this Orwellian lie by demanding every elite publication and journal repeat it, transforming the snake oil of lockdowns into "science."

I am sure that China's twitter campaign was not the only pressure applied to Boris, but such a massive social media campaign can be seen as preparing the public for a complete change in policy. The same applies to the other twitter campaigns discussed below in South Africa and India.

23/ Physicist Yaneer Bar-Yam has spent months uncritically cheerleading China's lockdowns—including CCP's genocidal lockdown in Xinjiang—and promoting China's obviously-fraudulent data. In February, Bar-Yam launched a website recommending strict lockdowns in 18 languages.

24/ Hard to think of any place more ill-suited to a total lockdown than Africa, but that's exactly what CCP's fake accounts demanded of South African President @CyrilRamaphosa on March 22. The next day, they got what they wanted, and Ramaphosa announced a total lockdown.

25/ India is a key rival of China, so CCP disinformation there is especially nasty. On March 23, CCP's army of fake accounts implored PM @PMOIndia to lock down India and order the army to "shoot on sight" to enforce it. The next day, Modi announced a destructive lockdown.

26/ On Dec 30, Li Wenliang warned friends of a new SARS-like illness in a message that went viral, causing widespread anger at CCP in China. On Jan 7, Xi informed his innermost circle that the situation in Wuhan would require their personal supervision.

27/ Two weeks later, the CCP locked down Wuhan based on Xi's philosophy of 'fangkong,' the same hybrid of health and security policy that inspired the mass 'quarantine' of over one million Uyghurs 'infected with extremism' in reeducation camps.

28/ International COVID hysteria began two days later with a viral tweet by Eric Ding calling the coronavirus R0 'thermonuclear,' the first of many dubious tweets by the previously-unknown Ding, prompting a prominent colleague to call him a 'charlatan.'

Interesting how overseas Chinese can be used at the right moment to speak out for the policies of the Chinese government. For better or worse, my experience is that some overseas Chinese almost automatically take on the views of the government even though they are not citizens of China themselves.

29/ The Politburo co-opted Li Wenliang’s fame for their own ends, declaring him a national martyr and ensuring the haunting image of Li on a ventilator—which are now known to be counterproductive—was carried by every major news outlet and seared into the world's memory.

30/ It seems CCP didn't need to buy Bill Gates. In Gates' words: "China, on the other hand, 'did a very good job of suppressing the virus,' thanks, in part, to the 'typical, fairly authoritarian' approach and the 'individual rights that were violated.'"

I am sure that the super-rich Bill Gates has more in common with the current rulers of China than he does with most other citizens of the USA. And remember, his wealth came from a MONOPOLY on computer software. If there is one theme that runs through the NWO, it is MONOPOLY. Free enterprise is a mugs game.


1. CONFIRMED: China Launched a Massive Social Media Campaign in March to Get Countries to Adopt Stringent Coronavirus Lockdowns and Destroy Their Economies https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2020/08/confirmed-china-launched-massive-social-media-campaign-march-get-countries-adopt-stringent-coronavirus-lockdowns-destroy-economies/

2. MPS@MichaelPSenger

3. The link to the original article is given as: https://nytimes.com/2020/06/11/technology/twitter-chinese-misinformation.html When I put this into my browser I got "Page Not Found. We’re sorry, we seem to have lost this page, but we don’t want to lose you. Report the broken link here."

4. Daniel Andrews has sold out Victoria to the Strong Cities Network (SCN) with PRIVATISED POLICE https://australianvoice.livejournal.com/44497.html

Daniel Andrews has sold out Victoria to the Strong Cities Network (SCN) with PRIVATISED POLICE

Dig a little deeper and it becomes obvious as to what's happening in Victoria.
Daniel Andrews has also sold out Victoria to the Strong Cities Network (SCN).

What is Strong Cities Network?
The privatisation of a Police Force governed by global NGO's. And Victoria is the only state in Australia to sign on.
Why do you think the Police at Melbourne's Freedom Day Rally acted like goons, were dressed in black and didn't have the Australian logo on their uniforms?

SCN is an initiative of London based think tank ISD.
Their mission statement is to "Power Solutions to Extremism and Polarisation"

But it's the link to the Partners and Funders that gives everything away.
Of course George Soros is involved with his Open Society Foundation. And Big Tech is involved with Facebook, Google, Twitter and Microsoft amongst others.
Amongst NGO's and Think Tanks, the dubious Brookings Institute sticks out - and I'm sure a deep dive into some of these would connect Bill & Melinda Gates and the Rockerfeller Foundations everywhere.

What struck me really odd are the connections to Australian Universities such as Curtin and Victoria Universities and various Australian government departments - including our very own asshole, Dicktator Dan.

So as you find out today that the curfews in Victoria are not based on the Chief Health Officer's advice, and rather Dicktator Dan has put this in place, remember that From Sent1nel (https://www.facebook.com/sent1n3l/posts/132412898571458)

Dicktator Dan even hosted the Strong Cities Global summit in 1998

From Sent1nel (https://www.facebook.com/sent1n3l/posts/132412898571458)

The "Covid-19 Emergency": What Is Really Going On?

The "Covid Emergency" is very complex. Many things are going on at the same time and many are interconnected. I do not even touch on all of them here, and perhaps no one person understands all of it. My point is to show you all the things I have seen so far.

1. The overall Agenda is driven by the super-rich (Rockefeller, Rothschild etc) which own and control the world-wide private banking cartel. One of the important parts of this cartel is the Bank of England & The City in London. They want to impose a totally new way of life for all of us which will make them even richer and make us completely powerless serfs/slaves. The work through the UN, WHO, World Bank, IMF. World Economic Forum etc, etc. They OWN all media & social media and exercise widespread censorship to make people believe their lies.

2. One purpose of the emergency is to provide a cover for the destruction of the world economy which I could call the Great Depression 2.0, worse than the one in 1929. Covid did not cause an economic collapse, governments did this with their medically unnecessary lockdowns. Most people don't blame the governments as they should, they blame "covid" a more or less harmless virus which has a very good propaganda department behind it.

3. In the UK the emergency is used as a cover to completely change the adminstrative structure of the government in a way which will remove any kind of democratic control. For more details see past and present episodes of UKColumn. (They may have plans for the Royals too but I don't know what those are.)

4. They clearly want to kill off older people and the vulnerable as was done in the "care" homes in the UK and other countries. These people are seen as useless mouths (a NAZI term). They don't want to pay for their care or give them pensions. In the end the super-rich want no taxes. How to do this? User pays, even for schools etc. (see 12)

5. They also want to kill off all small businesses. If people have money, they want it to be spent consuming things from the giant monopoly corporations that are behind the emergency. Lockdowns and distancing are used to "justify" actions which will destroy most small businesses - but not the big ones. Note Starbucks and McDonalds do not have the same problems your local coffee shop or pub have. Same for big retailers.

6. Another big player is the pharmafia and the medical establishment. Most doctors are not much more than agents for the pharmacy companies. Have a problem? Take this pill. This is why - besides threats to be deregistered - many doctors are going along with the absurd covid medicine used to scare people into submission. Big pharma do not want to see any cheaper, natural cures for anything, like HCQ. There is also a very promising treatment for cancer which got people killed and others sent to prison. The basic medical myth behind the emergency is that our own (fantastic) immune system (developed by evolution for millions of years) cannot protect us from Covid-19. To protect us we need masks, lockdowns, distancing and in the end A VACCINE to be developed by the pharmafia. We can only be safe if ALL are vaccinated. (Notice that no company will accept any liability for this mandatory vaccine which will be administered every year until we die.)

7. Gates and the super-rich have long pushed for eugenics, a reduction of the world's population because they think there are too many people. Fewer people really means less on the ground opposition to their plans. They don't need so many people to make a profit so they want to get rid of the rest of us.

8. Another big item on the Agenda is 5G everywhere. This is tied to a system of total surveillance and what they call the internet of things. IOT If interested people should look this up. It is NOT covered in the mainstream media but it is a VERY BIG part of their New World Order.

9. ID2020 "An alliance of multinational companies, global consulting firms, including Gavi or Vaccine Alliance, Rockefeller Foundation, Microsoft, etc. has been formed to provide a “holistic and market-based approach” to help governments of the world provide a “good national ID” to “prove who you are” because it is “a fundamental and universal human right.” They will do this in conjunction with government-funded mandatory vaccinations. What could possibly go wrong? Imagine how backward this thinking really is. Instead of looking for healthcare solutions, they are instead working on the perfection of their control grid as if their financial grip on everyone is not enough."

10. The digital ID is connected to a medical control system using "health passports" connected to ID which proves you have had your early vaccination against Covid-19. If you don't have this passport or proof you are medically "safe" you cannot enter stores, pubs, buses, hospitals or almost anything else. It is quite possible that the required vaccination will in fact genetically alter your immune system to make it ineffective so you need vaccinations to live. This is based on the Covid lie that we need protection from Covid to be "safe". In fact our immune system is perfectly capable of protecting us from Covid, but to admit this is to admit we don't actually need Gates' vaccinations.

11. Another feature of the new system will be the cashless economy. This means that in order to be paid, buy or sell things you need an account at a bank which you access via a card or whatever. This would then give banks + governments complete control over their citizens. The would know every financial transaction, and if they wished - because of your actions - to stop your access to "your" money. Remember that when the bank has "your" money it is legally theirs. There is virtually no legal recourse against such behaviour by banks. If this transaction card is linked to your ID2020 then they have even more control of you.

12. I have seen discussions in which companies plan to replace what we know of as school education. The idea is to get rid of teachers, develop computer learning programs for students to go through on their own. There is also discussion of linking your education record and work record to your ID + health records all on one app or chip. Note here that the skills developed and "knowledge" learned is formulated by business and directely connected to their needs for employment.

13. There is also discussion of this: Billionaire Elon Musk is known for his futuristic ideas and his latest suggestion might just save us from being irrelevant as artificial intelligence (AI) grows more prominent. He said on Monday that humans need to merge with machines to become a sort of cyborg. “Over time I think we will probably see a closer merger of biological intelligence and digital intelligence,”

14. Finally there is the whole UN "climate change" agenda given below. Almost every thing which we normally take to be important in human society is removed. These things are seldom mentioned because almost nobody would agree with these changes. The whole program is essentially anti-human.

There are also several other articles on this blog related to this subject:

Covid-19: Phase 1 of the "Permanent Crisis" by Mike Whitney

UK Hospital System Has Been Totally Destroyed During Covid "Emergency"!

Covid-19 PRC Tests: When Is a Test Not a Test?


PLANDEMIC: Interview With Whistleblower Who Worked in US Bioweapons Labs

Penalty for Cash Transaction Over $10,000 will be 2 Years Jail + $25,200 Fine

Can We Have Economic Freedom in a Cashless Financial System?

Cash is for Criminals? No, This is Spin! Cashless is for Banks!

Covid-19: Phase 1 of the "Permanent Crisis" by Mike Whitney

(A copy of this article can be found here - perhaps https://www.unz.com/mwhitney/covid-19-phase-1-of-the-permanent-crisis/)
JULY 15, 2020

This is full article about the crisis we are now facing and it explains why and how this is happening.

Let’s assume that the events of the last five months are neither random nor unexpected. Let’s say they’re part of an ingenious plan to transform American democracy into a lockdown police state controlled by criminal elites and their puppet governors. And let’s say the media’s role is to fan the flames of mass hysteria by sensationalizing every gory detail, every ominous prediction and every slightest uptick in the death toll in order to exert greater control over the population. And let’s say the media used their power to craft a message of terror they’d repeat over and over again until finally, there was just one frightening storyline ringing-out from every soapbox and bullhorn, one group of governors from the same political party implementing the same destructive policies, and one small group of infectious disease experts –all incestuously related– issuing edicts in the form of “professional advice.”

Could such a thing happen in America?

What’s most astonishing about the Covid-19 operation is the manner in which the elected government was circumvented by public health experts (connected to a power-mad billionaire activist.) That was a stroke of genius. Most people regard the US as a fairly stable democracy and yet, the first sign of infection triggered the rapid transfer of power from the president to unelected “professionals” whose conflicts of interest are too vast to list. Equally fascinating is the fact that the lockdowns were not the brainchild of Donald Trump but the mainly Democrat governors who shrugged-off any Constitutional limits to their power and arbitrarily ordered people to stay in their homes, wear masks and avoid close physical contact with other humans. All of this was done in the name of “science” and condoned under “emergency powers” despite the fact that mass quarantines of healthy people have no historical precedent or scientific basis. No matter, this was never about science or logic anyway, and it certainly wasn’t about saving lives. It was always about power, pure, unalloyed political power. The power to push the economy into freefall destroying millions of jobs and businesses. The power to bail out Wall Street while diverting attention to a fairly-mild infection that kills roughly 1 in every 500 people. The power to create a permanent underclass willing to work for table scraps or less. And the power to fundamentally restructure human relations so that normal intimacies like handshakes, hugs or social gatherings are entirely banned. This, of course, was the most ambitious part of the project, the basic changes to human interaction that date back thousands of years, and which are now seen as an obstacle to a new order in which the individual must be isolated, desensitized and kept in a constant state of fear to be more easily controlled and manipulated.

On top of that, all of this is taking place in plain sight where anyone with even minimal critical thinking skills should be able to see what is happening, but very few do. Why is that?

Fear. Fear has gripped the population and is preventing typically intelligent, perceptive people from seeing something that’s right beneath their noses. Check out this clip from an article titled “When Will the Madness End?”:

“What’s happening now is a spread of this serious medical condition to the whole population… The public is adopting a personality disorder … paranoid delusions, and irrational fear. … It can happen with anything but here we see a primal fear of disease turning into mass panic….
…. Once fear reaches a certain threshold, normalcy, rationality, morality, and decency fade and are replaced by shocking stupidity and cruelty.…..We find that whole communities suddenly fix their minds upon one object, and go mad in its pursuit; that millions of people become simultaneously impressed with one delusion, and run after it, till their attention is caught by some new folly more captivating than the first.
…This is made far worse by politics, which has only fed the beast of fear. This is the most politicized disease in history, and doing so has done nothing to help manage it and much to make it all vastly worse.”
(“When Will the Madness End?“, AIER)

We’re not saying that Covid doesn’t kill people, and we’re not suggesting that Covid is a bioweapon released on the public for nefarious purposes. (although that’s certainly a possibility.) What we’re saying is that scheming elites and their allies in the media and politics see every crisis as an opportunity to advance their own authoritarian agenda. In fact, the restructuring of basic democratic institutions can only take place within the confines of a major crisis. That’s why the CIA, the giant corporations, the WHO and the Gates Posse gathered for meetings that anticipated an event just like the Covid outbreak. They needed a crisis of that magnitude to achieve their ultimate objective; total control. That’s what they mean when they say there will be “no return to normal”, they mean they’re replacing representative government with a new totalitarian model in which the levers of state power will be controlled by them. So while the virus outbreak might be coincidental, the management of the crisis certainly is not. This is from an article by Gary Barnett:

“We are in the midst of an attempt by the oligarchs to eliminate the human spirit, and if this attempt is successful, the singular majesty of the human experience will have been abolished, and only a technocratic black hole of emptiness and despair will remain. This is the essence of a failed society brought about by the destruction of human intellect by state education, mass propaganda, and the planned control of individuals through physical and psychological manipulation due to fear.”(“Pandemic Madness: The State’s Plan Rests on the Destruction of the Human Spirit“, Gary Barnett, Lew Rockwell)

Is the author exaggerating?

I don’t think so. Our species has withstood myriad epidemics in the past without ever resorting to the extremist measures we have taken during this latest outbreak. Take the state of Oregon, for example, whose Democratic governor Kate Brown just signed another executive order extending a state of emergency through Sept. 4. The move comes months after the peak in deaths was reached in mid-April. As of Tuesday, Oregon’s death toll is a meager 240 nearly 90% of who are over 65 with underlying health conditions. That means that Brown shut down a $226 billion per year economy, put tens of thousands of people out of work, destroyed countless small and medium-sized businesses and plunged the state deep into debt, to save roughly 24 or 25 people under 65 with no underlying health conditions. That’s not the reaction of an intelligent, responsible political leader acting in the best interests of the people. That is the reaction of someone who is either criminally insane or doing someone else’s bidding. So which is it?

Like many of the other mainly Democrat governors, Brown also issued a “mask” mandate, punishable by a fine. The new executive order was neither approved by the House or by any other democratic body. It’s just Brown testing the limits of her new emergency powers. Interestingly, the mask mandate comes a full three months after the state reached its peak in fatalities which means that it has less to do with controlling the infection than it does with using the virus to usurp tyrannical powers. Does that mean Brown or the other Democrat governors are closet tyrants?
Probably not. But it does suggest that the people who fund Brown’s campaigns and pull her strings want to see how far they can push things before the public fights back. Here’s a comment by Carlo Caduff in the Medical Anthropology Quarterly that helps to put these developments into perspective:

“Across the world, the pandemic unleashed authoritarian longings in democratic societies allowing governments to seize the opportunity, create states of exception and push political agendas. Commentators have presented the pandemic as a chance for the West to learn authoritarianism from the East. This pandemic risks teaching people to love power and call for its meticulous application.” (“What Went Wrong: Corona and the World After the Full Stop“ Academia.edu)

Once again, we are not denying that Covid kills people. All we’re saying is that powerful elites are using crisis management to advance their own narrow political agenda.

It should be no surprise that states governed by Democrats are doing considerably worse than those run by Republicans. Watching the eagerness with which the Dems impose their economy-crushing measures, one can only wonder how the states will ever dig out of the current mess and regain solvency. Of course, maybe that’s the goal, to generate so much red ink that essential social services will have to be slashed, the poor will be left to starve, and the big money guys will buy-up public assets for pennies on the dollar. Indeed, that must be the plan, “shock therapy for the proles while the Democrat governors act as a battering ram to open the state to the plunder and looting of their Wall Street crony friends and others in the parasite class. Here’s how Israel Shamir summed it up in a recent article at the Unz Review:

“There are people who think we have it too good. They think we did nothing to deserve our high civilization. They think we shouldn’t be able to afford food, the roof above our heads and other goodies. This is the view of some very wealthy people. They are annoyed at seeing Tom, Dick and Harry going to Acapulco and eating in a restaurant, instead of being at their beck and call. They want to lower our income and raise the cost of living. They are willing to fund anyone who calls for more austerity.
"Now they support lockdowns, claiming that it is the best way to fight disease. Yesterday they were calling on us to shut down industry in order to save the climate. Today these same people are still trying to reduce us to poverty, this time for the sake of Covid”
(“Unmasking Freedom, The Unz review)

Shamir is right of course, the justifications are forever changing while the ultimate goal remains the same, wreak havoc the economy, divide the people into warring camps, and clear the way for the new streamlined system of authoritarian government, the glorious NWO. And the speed at which we are moving towards this new order is truly breathtaking. Take a look at this sampling of articles I’ve compiled which illustrates the catastrophic damage that is being done to the economy but swept under the rug by the media. In short, Covid is the diversion that keeps the American people from realizing that the system that keeps them employed, pays the mortgage and puts food on the table is being decimated by voracious oligarchs who want to start fresh. Check out these articles:

Some 42% Of Jobs Lost In Pandemic Are Gone For Good
US Consumer Credit Crashes As Americans Repay A Record Amount Of Credit Card Debt
A Tidal Wave of Bankruptcies is Coming
“More Than Half Of The US Population Is Not Working”
“52% Of Small Businesses Expect To Be Out Of Business Within Six Months
“53% Of Restaurants Closed Amid Coronavirus Have Shuttered Permanently”
Tsunami” Of Evictions Could Make 28 Million Americans Homeless This Summer Alone

Hurtling towards Depression–Based on information as of May 2020, we show that global consumption losses amount to 3.8$tr, triggering significant job (147 million full-time equivalent) and income (2.1$tr) losses.
Eighty percent feel country is spiraling out of control, according to Wall Street Journal/NBC poll.

Anyway, you get the picture, the situation is dire. But as severe as the economic carnage may be, the psychic damage is that much worse. Many readers probably already know that suicides, divorces, child abuse, alcoholism, drug abuse and domestic violence have all risen sharply in the last 5 months. The impact of the lockdowns on people suffering from chronic depression or other mental health conditions has also increased dramatically. As Doctor Waqar Rashid opines in an article at The Spectator:

“Many people are… still terrified.,… afraid of venturing back into the outside world…. Masks are everywhere, and are compulsory on public transport. The result is a reminder that this ‘new normal’ is utterly unlike what we are used to. Even to those who don’t suffer from mental health problems it’s a depressing and dispiriting sight. And I fear this ongoing state of stress and anxiety is doing profound damage to people’s psychological wellbeing...
It was widely acknowledged before the pandemic struck that mental health problems were not only increasing in number but also being seen more frequently in younger people. As a neurologist, the people I see are especially at risk from suffering from mental health problems. It’s a sad fact that in my line of work, we can cure very little. But we can try to control and mitigate the illnesses we seek to treat. Much of this relies on the patient remaining hopeful and optimistic about their prospects. But now, surrounded as we are by this ‘invisible enemy’, all too often hope has been substituted for fear, even terror.”
(“What’s the true cost of lockdown?”, The Spectator)

It all boils down to this: Ruling class elites are using a public health crisis to wage a full-scale war on the American people and their system of representative government. The Democrat-CIA-Media Axis has been instrumental in prosecuting the conflict, as they were in the Russiagate fiasco. These are the shock troops who execute the battleplan of economic strangulation, covert skulduggery, and relentless disinformation. By the time the American people figure out what’s going on, the political landscape will have changed completely.

Stop Fu**Ing Around and Open the G**Dam Economy

UK Hospital System Has Been Totally Destroyed During Covid "Emergency"!

Guest post by an anonymous consultant from https://www.facebook.com/john.gossip

According to this Surrey consultant, hospital staff will lose their jobs if they talk to the press.

"Released 08/07/20.
I am a consultant at a major, regional hospital in Surrey. By major you can take that to indicate that we have an A&E department. I had agreed to give an interview to an anti lockdown activist in which I would have revealed my identity. I have since changed my mind and only feel able to give an anonymous statement. I have changed my mind simply because all staff, no matter what grade, at all hospitals have been warned that if they give any media interviews at all or make any statements to either the Main Stream Press or smaller, independent press /social media we may, immediately be suspended without pay. I have a family, dependents and I simply cant do it to them. I therefore can not reveal my identity at this time but wish to state as follows:

In my opinion, and that of many of my colleagues, there has been no Covid Pandemic, certainly not in the Surrey region and I have heard from other colleagues this picture is the same throughout the country. Our hospital would normally expect to see around 350,000 out patients a year. Around 95,000 patients are admitted to hospital in a normal year and we would expect to see around a similar figure, perhaps 100,000 patients pass through our A&E department. In the months from March to June (inclusive) we would normally expect to see 100,000 out patients, around 30,000 patients admitted to hospital and perhaps 30,000 pass through A&E. This year (and these figures are almost impossible to get hold of) we are over 95% down on all those numbers. In effect, the hospital has been pretty much empty for that entire period.

At the start, staff that questioned this were told that we were being used as ‘redundant’ capacity, kept back for the ‘deluge’ we were told would come. It never did come, and when staff began to question this, comments like, ‘for the greater good’ and to ‘protect the NHS’ came down from above. Now its just along the lines of, ‘Shut up or you don’t get paid’. The few Covid cases that we have had, get repeatedly tested, and every single test counted as a new case. Meaning the figures reported back to ONS / PHE (Office for National Statistics & Public Health England) were almost exponentially inflated. It could be that Covid cases reported by hospitals are between 5 to 10x higher than the real number of cases. There has been no pandemic and this goes a long way to explain why figures for the UK are so much higher than anywhere else in Europe.

The trust has been running empty ambulances during lockdown and is still doing it now. By this I mean ambulances are driving around, with their emergency alert systems active (sirens & / or lights) with no job to go to. This I believe has been to give the impression to the public that there is more demand for ambulances than there actually is. Staff only wear face coverings/ masks & social distance when public facing, as soon as they are out of public view, the masks come off and social distancing is not observed. Indeed jokes are made about the measures, and I have heard staff express amazement that despite warnings on packets and at point of sales, telling people masks are totally ineffective and dangerous, the public still buy them, because a politician has told them too.

We have cancelled the vast majority of operations and of these ALL elective surgery has been cancelled. That’s surgery that has been pre planned / waiting list. Non elective Surgery, this tends to be emergency surgery or that which is deemed urgent has been severely curtailed. The outcome of this is simple. People are at best being denied basic medical care and at worst, being left to die, in some cases, in much distress and pain.

Regarding death certification. All staff that are responsible for this have been encouraged where possible to put Covid-19 complications as reason for death, even though the patient may have been asymptomatic and also not even tested for covid. I feel this simply amounts to fraudulently completed death certificates and has been responsible to grossly inflating the number of Covid deaths. The fact is that regardless of what you actually die of in hospital, it is likely that Covid-19 will feature on your death certificate. I have included with my statement the detailed published guidance from Government on Death Certification which shows how Covid-19, as a factor is encouraged to at least feature on a death certificate. Remember Covid-19 itself can not kill. What kills is complications from the virus, typically pneumonia like symptoms. These complications are in reality incredibly rare but have featured and a large amount of death certificates issued in recent months. As long as Covid-19 appears on a death certificate, that death is counted as Covid-19 in the figures released by the ONS and PHE. I genuinely believe that many death certificates, especially amongst the older 65+ demographic have been fraudulently completed so as to be counted as Covid-19 deaths when in reality Covid-19 complications did not cause the death.

There have been Thursday nights when I stood, alone in my office and cried as I heard people cheering and clapping outside. It sickens me to see all the ‘Thank You NHS’ signs up everywhere and the stolen rainbow that for me now says one word and word only: Fear.

There are many good people in the NHS and whilst I do not plead forgiveness for myself, I do plead for them. Most are on low pay, they joined for the right reasons and I did and have been bullied and threatened that if they don’t ‘stay on message’ they don’t eat. I know that if a way could be found to assure staff within the NHS of safety against reprisals, there would be a tsunami of whistleblowers which I have no doubt would help end this complete and brutal insanity. I am finding it increasingly hard to live with what I have been involved in and I am sorry this has happened. To end, I would simply say this. Politicians haven’t changed, the country has just made a fatal mistake and started trusting them without question."

Covid-19 PRC Tests: When Is a Test Not a Test?

All over the world people are being tested for Covid-19 using what is called the PRC test, Polymerase Chain Reaction. This test is very important because many countries have declared a Medical Emergency. In Australia the Biosecurity Act 2015 allows people to be detained or forced to seek treatment.(1) In the UK a person is “potentially infectious” at any time if the person is, or may be, infected with coronavirus, and there is a risk that the person might infect others. Under this law an official of the UK government has: "powers to direct or remove persons to a place suitable for screening and assessment" and "powers exercisable after assessment."(2)

All of these powers depend on the ability of a government to determine who is or may be infected with Covid-19, and the method used most often is the PCR test. Our media and all government representatives assume that this is a simple, straightforward test which can give reliable results. The purpose of this article is to explain how the PCR test is so flawed that both positive or negative results are virtually meaningless. We can begin by comparing the PCR test with a range of other tests used all over the world to test the level of alcohol in your blood. These tests, like the PCR test for Covid-19, are connected with laws which have a range of serious consequences for a positive result.

This discussion may seem to be overkill, but it is necessary to bring into focus the many ways that PCR tests are unlike the standard alcohol tests.

First we all know when and why our blood alcohol will be tested. If we have been driving a motor powered vehicle too fast, erratically, or have been involved in a accident we can expect such a test. We do not expect to be tested while shopping, drinking coffee or sitting at home watching TV.

Second, the tests are carried out with methods or machines which have been deliberately constructed to perform this task:

"Most police use an electronic device about the size of a walkie-talkie. You blow into a mouthpiece, and it gives an immediate reading. The most common manual test includes a balloon and a glass tube filled with yellow crystals. You blow into the balloon and release the air into the tube. The bands of crystals in the tube change color from yellow to green depending on how much alcohol is in your system."(3)

We may assume the electronic devices are calibrated regularly since their results can be challenged in court if the accused person suspects they are defective.

Third, there are other ways to detect your blood alcohol level. If there are doubts about the police test there are other, better ways to check blood alcohol levels. No police breath test is as accurate as a blood or urine test.(4)

The fourth and most obvious point is that there is absolutely no medical or scientific doubt about what alcohol is. Just because you drank beer rather than vodka, the tests have no trouble identifying the different kinds of alcohol.

Now we are ready to begin the comparison between testing for blood-alcohol levels and testing for Covid-19 with PCR tests.

How do we usually get a test from a serious Health Laboratory? We visit a doctor or a hospital, explain our problem, and if they think a test is needed to help them understand what is wrong, They order a test for us. Virtually all Covid-19 PCR tests do not happen in this way. Somebody decides that because of where we live, or where we have been, we need a test. There is usually no other medical examination.

Now countries are doing door to door testing in the way shifty sales people or religious believers have done for decades. They pressure people into having this test and people are afraid to refuse. Have you ever been afraid to reject the offer of any other medical test? What we are seeing here is a serious departure from any kind of medical investigation we have seen for 100 years. There is testing but no diagnosis and no medical assistance. If you test positive you become a new "case" of Covid-19 and you must cut yourself off from any human contact for a specified period, often two weeks. Clearly these tests have nothing to improve our health as individuals. They assume we have become a threat to others because we have or might have Covid-19. The tests are seen as an investigation related to public health.

According to new UK legislation:

'Coronavirus' means severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2); 'coronavirus disease' means COVID-19 (the official designation of the disease which can be caused by coronavirus)."(5)

In the West, it’s difficult to find out what makes a “case,” ie what the definition of a "case of Covid-19" is. So far, experts have seen that while there are severe cases, the Covid-19 infection is usually mild with non-specific symptoms. And there are no trademark clinical features of COVID-19 infection. The usual clinical features for serious cases is that Covid involves an acute lack of oxygen. For reasons that are not clear, people can’t breathe.

If a PCR test is positive, you are seen as a "case" and subject to a range of new laws. However in China, much maligned for its "totalitarian" system, patients are diagnosed "‘Corona’ with CT scans and one or two positive PCR tests." The point of the CT scans is to examine the lungs of the patient. What this means is that the West has all but abandoned classical diagnostic medicine in favor of biotech, or lab result medicine. The “Corona test” is a lab test called: “CDC 2019-nCoV Real-Time RT-PCR Diagnostic Panel.”

qTOWER³ Real-Time PCR Thermal Cycler from Analytik Jena shown here.

The Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) was invented by Kary B. Mullis in 1984. What he developed was a formula for DNA amplification. The method is based on the concept of “reiterative exponential growth processes.” In basic terms it allows a researcher to start with a very small sample of DNA and by means of a series of cycles in which it is heated and cooled. In this way the amount of DNA increases enough so it can be studied. In effect, one starts with a small amount of DNA and from this it is possible to manufacture much more of the same thing. PCR, simply put, is a thermal cycling method used to make up to billions of copies of a specific DNA sample, making it large enough to study. Dr. Mullis wrote himself, on May 7, 2013:

“PCR detects a very small segment of the nucleic acid which is part of a virus itself. The specific fragment detected is determined by the somewhat arbitrary choice of DNA primers used which become the ends of the amplified fragment."(6)

Here we see a very important difference between testing for blood-alcohol and testing for Covid-19. The PCR amplification technique was originally developed to create more DNA material, not to test for anything. Dr. David Rasnick, bio-chemist, protease developer, and former founder of an EM lab called Viral Forensics explained how a patient with Covid-19 would be dealt with using the standard policy of examination first, not testing without examination.

“You don’t start with testing; you start with listening to the lungs. I’m skeptical that a PRC test is ever true. It’s a great scientific research tool. It’s a horrible tool for clinical medicine. (7)

This shows that there are some scientists in this field who believe the current PCR test for Covid-19 is simply barking up the wrong tree. It is not fit for the purpose it is currently used for. We will see that this is not just a empty, theoretical objection to this method of testing for Covid-19. Rather it explains why the PCR test for Covid-19 infection is completely unreliable and incapable of determining if a person has or does not have such an infection. Here are six different reasons why the PCR test is no more reliable identifying a Covid-19 infection than flipping a coin: heads is positive, tails is negative.

The discussion of the reliability of PCR tests for the diagnosis of infectious diseases is not new. Decades ago this same test was used for AIDS, and its inventor, Kary Mullis, himself came to the front line arguing against PCR as diagnostic tool.(8)

“The first thing to know is that the test is not binary,” he said. “In fact, I don’t think there are any tests for infectious disease that are positive or negative. What they do is they take some kind of a continuum and they arbitrarily say this point is the difference between positive and negative.”(9)

Most people think of the PCR test as showing one of two things: Positive or negative, like a pregnancy test. You have it or you don’t.

“PCR is really a manufacturing technique. You start with one molecule. You start with a small amount of DNA and on each cycle the amount doubles, which doesn’t sound like that much, but if you, if you double 30 times, you get approximately a billion times more material than you started with. So as a manufacturing technique, it’s great. What they do is they attach a fluorescent molecule to the RNA as they produce it. You shine a light at one wavelength, and you get a response, you get light sent back at a different wavelength. So, they measure the amount of light that comes back and that’s their surrogate for how much DNA there is. I’m using the word DNA. There’s a step in RT- PCR test which is where you convert the RNA to DNA. So, the PCR test is actually not using the viral RNA. It’s using DNA, but it’s like the complimentary RNA. So logically it’s the same thing, but it can be confusing. Like why am I suddenly talking about DNA? Basically, there’s a certain number of cycles.”(10)

Diagram of the method of duplication with two cycles.

“In one paper I found 37 cycles. If you didn’t get enough fluorescence by 37 cycles, you are considered negative. In another, paper, the cutoff was 36. Thirty-seven to 40 were considered 'indeterminate.' And if you got in that range, then you did more testing. I’ve only seen two papers that described what the limit was. So, it’s quite possible that different hospitals, different States, Canada versus the US, Italy versus France are all using different cutoff sensitivity standards of the Covid test. So, if you cut off at 20, everybody would be negative. If you cut off a 50, you might have everybody positive.(11)

“I think if a country said, 'You know, we need to end this epidemic,' they could quietly send around a memo saying: 'We shouldn’t be having the cutoff at 37. If we put it at 32, the number of positive tests drops dramatically. If it’s still not enough, well, you know, 30 or 28 or something like that. So, you can control the sensitivity.'"(12)

This shows that labs can manipulate how many “cases" of Covid-19 their country has.

“Another reason we know this is bogus is from a remarkable series of graphs published by some people from Singapore in JAMA. These graphs were published in the supplementary information, which is an indication that nobody’s supposed to read them. And I think the authors probably just threw them in because they were interesting graphs, but they didn’t realize what was in them. So, they were 18 graphs of 18 different people. And at this hospital in Singapore, they did daily coronavirus tests and they grasped the number of PCR cycles necessary to detect fluorescence. Or if they couldn’t detect florescence by…37 cycles, they put a dot on the bottom of the graph, signifying a negative.”(13)

“So, in this group of 18 people, the majority of people went from positive, which is normally read as “infected,” to negative, which is normally read as “uninfected” back to positive—infected again. So how do you interpret this? How do you have a test if a test act is actually, you know, 100% positive for detecting infection, then the negative results must’ve been wrong? And so, one way to solve that is to move the point from 37 to say 36 or 38. You can move this, this cycle of numbers. It’s an arbitrary division up or down. But there’s no guarantee that if you did that, you wouldn’t still have the same thing. It would just, instead of going from, from 36 to undetectable and back to 36 or back to 45, it might go from 33 to undetectable to 30 or something like that. Right? So, you can’t solve the problem by changing this arbitrary binary division. And so basically this says that the test is not detecting infection. Because if it was, like if you’re infected, and then you’re uninfected, and you’re in a hospital with the best anti-infective precautions in the world, how did you get re-infected? And if you cured the infection, why didn’t you have antibodies to stop you getting re-infected? So, there’s no explanation within the mainstream that can explain these results. That’s why I think they’re so important.”(14)

There is a case in the literature of a woman who had been in contact with a suspect case of Corona (in Wuhan) they believed was the index case.

“She was important to the supposed chain of infection because of this. They tested her 18 times, different parts of the body, like nose, throat—different PCR tests. 18 different tests. And she tested negative every time. And then they—because of her epidemiological connection with the other cases, they said: “We consider her infected. So, they had 18 negative tests and they said she was infected.”(15)

“Now why was she important? Well there was only one other person who could have theoretically transmitted the virus if the original patient, outside the family was who they thought it was. But secondly, she had the same exact symptoms as everybody else. Right? So, four people in his family came down with fever and cough and headaches, fatigue and all these kinds of big symptoms. So, if she could get those symptoms without the virus, then you, you’ve got to say, well, why couldn’t everybody else’s symptoms be explained by whatever she had? I mean, maybe they, they ate some bad seafood or something and so they all got sick, but it had nothing to do with the coronavirus. But because three out of the four, tested positive, then they were, they were all considered infected and out of the same paper."(16)


"Another interesting thing is that they did a lot of tests. The first person in the list of people tested, he was positive on three out of 11 tests. So again, they took nose and throat samples and you know, different methods and all this kind of stuff. And they got 11 separate tests and only three were positive. And of course, all you need to be considered infected is one positive test. They could test you 20 times and if you test positive once, then you’re infected. So, a positive test is meaningful. A negative test. It’s like, eh. Not so much.”(17)

Here we see a situation like this: Heads I win, tails you lose. When the government is testing you, a positive test means their laws w/r to medical emergencies applies to you. But a negative test does not get you off the hook. This is seen as a "false negative".

We have lab tests for pregnancy, but in the end there is or is not a real fetus. There is no way to say that any PCR test is 50% accurate, or 80% or 99%. You can only do this if you can identify the virus independently of the test. So how are the current PCR tests evaluated? In Australia, and probably most of the rest of the world, the labs are given a synthesized DNA to use instead:

"Complementary DNA (cDNA) synthesized from the VIDRL SARS-CoV-2 has been made available to all Public Health Laboratory Network (PHLN) member laboratories as a test positive control. Synthetic positive control material in the form of nucleic acid templates is available from WHO/European Viral Archive."(18)

In a Reply to one of my tweets lysandergrant@lysandergrant explained:

"You must extract the original RNA from purified virions that were PROVEN to be the cause of disease, along with proper controls. These steps were skipped. It's honestly just lazy 'science'."(19)

The same point has been made by Torsten Engelbrecht and Konstantin Demeter in their article "COVID19 PCR Tests are Scientifically Meaningless":

"Moreover, it is worth mentioning that the PCR tests used to identify so-called COVID-19 patients presumably infected by what is called SARS-CoV-2 do not have a valid gold standard to compare them with.

"This is a fundamental point. Tests need to be evaluated to determine their preciseness — strictly speaking their “sensitivity” and “specificity” — by comparison with a “gold standard,” meaning the most accurate method available.

"As an example, for a pregnancy test the gold standard would be the pregnancy itself. But as Australian infectious diseases specialist Sanjaya Senanayake, for example, stated in an ABC TV interview in an answer to the question 'How accurate is the [COVID-19] testing?':

"If we had a new test for picking up [the bacterium] golden staph in blood, we’ve already got blood cultures, that’s our gold standard we’ve been using for decades, and we could match this new test against that. But for COVID-19 we don’t have a gold standard test.”

So the reliability of PCR tests can be evaluated, but not against a real virus which has been proved to cause Covid-19. In fact all we have is an unproved hypothesis that there is a real virus which causes what we call Covid-19 and we have created synthetic DNA which we believe is more or less like the real - but unproven - viral cause of Covid-19.

In some circumstances this might be called a conspiracy theory because politicians and the WHO are saying that there is a dreadful virus out there killing hundreds of thousands of people BUT THEY CAN'T ACTUALLY SHOW IT TO US OR PROVE IT CAUSES ILLNESS OR DEATH. It is really an hypothesis but if you insist on telling people this you will be locked up as insane or dangerous because you are putting so many lives at risk. Of course there is no conspiracy.

Now it is time to go back to our comparison between blood alcohol tests and the PCR test for Covid-19.

Blood alcohol tests are called for in a range of cases in which our performance in managing heavy equipment like cars or cranes must be monitored for safety and legal reasons. PCR tests are sometimes used in specific situations but are becoming regularly used almost randomly door-to-door or as people drive their cars past random check points.

Unlike the equipment used for testing blood alcohol levels, the PCR equpment was not designed primarily for testing anything. It is used for testing as blood from a wound can be used to write a message.

It is claimed there are other methods to detect the Covid-19 virus HOWEVER there is NO PROOF that what they detect is the SAME VIRUS because the alleged virus has never been isolated and properly identified. The polio virus is about 30 nm (nanometers) and can only be seen with an electron microscope. Particles of a Covid-19 virus would be even smaller.

Finally, virologists do not agree that there is any one test that can be used for identifying Covid-19 infections in the way scientists do agree that there are several quite reliable tests for blood alcohol.

Blind Freddy can see that there is very powerful political pressure behind the PCR test for Covid-19. All of the points made here about its complete unreliability are simply swept under the carpet, like the claim in the Australian that up to 150,000 people could die from this infection. This ABSURD claim has simply been forgotten while the real death toll is little more than 100.

What is the answer to our question: When is a test not a test? A test is not a test when it is really an instrument of political control, tied to the wide powers outlined in the Biosecurity Act 2015.


1. https://www.abc.net.au/news/2020-03-03/coronavirus-ag-flags-rarely-used-biosecurity-powers/12020034
2. http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2020/7/section/1/enacted
3. https://www.webmd.com/mental-health/addiction/breath-alcohol-test#1
4. Ibid.
5. http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2020/7/section/1/enacted
6. https://uncoverdc.com/2020/04/07/was-the-covid-19-test-meant-to-detect-a-virus/
7. Ibid.
8. Ibid. The following comments are based on Celia Farber's two-hour interview with David Crowe, a Canadian researcher with a degree in biology and mathematics, host of The Infectious Myth podcast, and President of the think-tank Rethinking AIDS.
9. Ibid.
10. Ibid.
11. Ibid.
12. Ibid.
13. Ibid.
14. Ibid.
15 Ibid.
16. Ibid.
17. Ibid.
18. https://www.health.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/2020/02/phln-guidance-on-laboratory-testing-for-sars-cov-2-the-virus-that-causes-covid-19.pdf
19. lysandergrant@lysandergrant
20. https://off-guardian.org/2020/06/27/covid19-pcr-tests-are-scientifically-meaningless/

This is based largely on the article "Was the COVID-19 Test Meant to Detect a Virus?" by Celia Farber. (https://uncoverdc.com/2020/04/07/was-the-covid-19-test-meant-to-detect-a-virus/) Her article covers much more material than I do, but my focus here is to explain in simple terms how the PCR test works. Once you understand this you can see why they are neither medical nor diagnostic. Instead they are a tyrants dream come true, providing an unchangeable reason to lock people up on the grounds of being a medical danger to human society. The Covid-19 "emergency" has opened the door to what is called Medical Martial Law, where anything can be done to anyone if they have "tested positive" to Covid-19.

"The globalists write code. They encode 'viruses' and give them a weaponized, video-game identity. In this video game, you lose all your freedoms, and must display gratitude and servitude. Viral code trumps all other forms of politics. Nothing can counter it. Especially not 'science.' The virus is also a sweeping metaphor for the spread of 'misinformation,' which means anything outside their religious doctrines, not recognizable by classical virology."
Celia Farber

'BlackLivesMatter' is a Racist Political Slogan

If you have a deep commitment to the BlackLivesMatter movement please do not read this article. It will only make you angry.
On the other had if you have some doubts about the political merit of the slogan, you might find it interesting. This work has two parts.
The first part is an analysis of an article posted in Everyday Feminism and widely reproduced with the title “Four Reasons Why Being Pro-Black Isn't the Same as Being Anti-White” by Wazi Maret Davis. (Ms Davis, born in 1944, was known for along time as Angela Davis.) I believe this very important article is the theoretical framework for the BlackLivesMatter slogan millions are now acting on.
The second part looks what generates the anger of the protesters: bi-partisan policies introduced since 1970 as manufacturers moved offshore looking for lower wages. They have resulted in police becoming well-armed security guards and a vast increase in US citizens in jail. These are used to subjugate the people for whom there is no longer paid employment.


In her article “Four Reasons Why Being Pro-Black Isn't the Same as Being Anti-White” Wazi Maret Davis comes very close to saying that any (white) person who objects to the slogan 'BlackLivesMatter' in “the present movement for Black lives” is a racist:

“In the present movement for Black lives, I've encountered many white people who have expressed negative, resentful, and antagonistic feelings about the unapologetic ways Black folks resist and lift themselves up.
“It seems, at times, as if the most 'well-intentioned,' or what you might call 'liberal,' of white people poignantly proclaim that AllLivesMatter before even attempting to mutter the words BlackLivesMatter - much less consider the very intentional relevance of that statement.
“These feelings are nothing new - in fact, white people centering whiteness have historically existed throughout Black resistance movements.
“Blackness, in this society, is seen as threatening and movements that uplift Black people are certainly not exempt from that perceived threat.”

She finds there are “well-intentioned” white people who do not like the slogan 'BlackLivesMatter', but is not surprised. There have always been “white people centering whiteness” who have been threatened by “movements that uplift Black people”.

Obviously she believes that the BLM movement is about “uplifting” black people, but it is just this question we need to examine. Unlike the Occupy Wall Street protests, where all violence was on the side of the police against the protesters, many BLM protests have been sparked serious violence by police and protesters. Further, the BLM movement is being funded by one of the wealthiest men in the world. It is beyond belief that the person who puts so much money into the movement, George Soros, has nothing to say about its political direction. We need to look Ms Davis' defence of the BLM movement before we can decide whether it can actually uplift black people.

Ms Davis begins by explaining that the media and political system have made whites in the US think that black liberation is directed against them. They have created “a false sense of threat in white America, when it was in fact white America that was the most violent and threatening towards the oppressed.” However she also says

“...the real threat to white America is not any Black revolutionary. The real threat is that they would lose a tremendous amount of their own privilege if they afforded Blacks with equal treatment and access to wealth, resources and livelihood.”

Can we ask how there is a “false threat” to whites from black liberation when Ms Davis says herself that equality between black and whites means whites “would lose a tremendous amount of their own privilege?” Is it not natural for anyone to be threatened by a serious loss of privilege? Have the media created a “false threat”? Ms Davis wants to dismiss the fears of whites as something created by the media, while at the same time insisting they are real. This is not a good beginning.

After this introduction she organizes her comments under four headings:

“1. I Don't Have to Hate White People in Order to Love My Blackness
(…) How we love ourselves and other Black people, when authentic, has nothing to do with hating white people.

“2. The War on Black People Is Deeply Intersectional
(…) Whites benefit from systems that are entirely too complex for generalizations and universalities. These systems, while they do prioritize white people under the value of white supremacy, they do not only benefit white people and they do not only benefit white people in one way.

“3. White Supremacy Manifests in Insidious and Interpersonal Ways
(…) The reasons we say "BlackLivesMatter" are not to say that only Black Lives Matter, but to say that we acknowledge the disproportionate violence Black folks experience that all lives do not have to. (...)

“4. It's Okay to Be Pro-Black in a World That's Anti-Black
(…) We have to convince ourselves every single day that we are worth something and that we are valuable, because we are surrounded by systems and a society that constantly devalues and dehumanizes us.
It is so radically important then, for us to be able to show both self and collective love.
“We know that we do not have to rely on these current systems because these systems were never meant to benefit us.
But once we are able to practice a radical self-love and collective love, we can create alternative systems that will allow us to thrive beyond basic survival.”

There are two different themes run together in her discussion. One is about the importance for blacks in having a healthy self-image, their personal identity. The other is about identity politics, which links your personal identity (your "colour") to a political action or group.

We all have a sense of our personal identity and self-worth, good or bad. There are many different components to our personal identity. We have a gender identity and we usually identify with a particular nation. Our skin colour is part of our identity, as well as our hair colour, religious beliefs or lack of them, our ancestors, traditions or customs. These are all part of who we are and there is nothing wrong with taking pride in these things about ourselves. In fact serious psychological and personal problems can develop if we don't like who we are.

This is an important part of our mental health, and much of what Ms Davis says about being black emphasizes just this point. Her first point (1) says clearly that when a black person loves their blackness this does not mean they hate people with a different colour skin or tradition. The importance of maintaining a positive self-image is repeated in point (4):

“We have to convince ourselves every single day that we are worth something and that we are valuable, because we are surrounded by systems and a society that constantly devalues and dehumanizes us. It is so radically important then, for us to be able to show both self and collective love.”

Anyone who objects to black people, or anyone else, having a healthy, positive self-image does not have their best interest in mind.

The other theme in her article is not just about personal self-identity.

“Loving Blackness, lifting up Blackness, and asserting Black Power can be frightening for a lot of white folks who just don't understand, who refuse to understand.”

Here we see the two themes run together. “Loving Blackness” and “lifting up Blackness” are concerned with promoting a healthy self-image for people having a black skin as part of their personal identity. The phrase “asserting Black Power” is concerned with political power. (Another somewhat different phrase “People Power” is also concerned with political power, but Ms Davis never uses this phrase.) She wants to direct people with a black skin as part of their personal identity into a movement seeking political power (only?) for people with a black skin, namely the BLM movement.

The first commandment, and the laws of virtually all countries, forbid killing any person, not just the killing of people of a certain kind. Any law or moral principle framed differently would obviously show bias. What would the rule: “Thou shalt not kill men.” tell women? What would the rule: “Thou shalt not kill Christians.” tell Jews? What would the rule: “Thou shalt not kill British people.” tell the inhabitants of other countries? So, what would the rule: “Thou shalt not kill blacks.” tell people who are not black?

Ms Davis seems to overlook the way a rule which is not a universal rule for all people makes those excluded from that rule somewhat nervous. What is the difference between "BlackLivesMatter” and “Thou Shalt Not Kill Blacks”? They protest or oppose the same thing, the killing of black people. Is it only racism that makes white people feel somewhat uncomfortable about this slogan?

Why is Ms Davis so antagonistic about people using or suggesting the slogan “AllLivesMatter”? Here is her answer:

“It seems, at times, as if the most 'well-intentioned,' or what you might call 'liberal,' of white people poignantly proclaim that AllLivesMatter before even attempting to mutter the words BlackLivesMatter - much less consider the very intentional relevance of that statement.”

She explains that people who use this slogan do not “consider the very intentional relevance” of the slogan “BlackLivesMatter”. So “AllLivesMatter” is not relevant but “BlackLivesMatter” is. Why is this? Is “AllLiveMatter” is not “relevant” because it does not draw attention only to the deaths of black people? Why are the deaths of other people not “relevant” to Ms Davis and the BLM movement?

Ms Davis answers this question as follows:

“The reasons we say BlackLivesMatter are not to say that only Black Lives Matter, but to say that we acknowledge the disproportionate violence Black folks experience that all lives do not have to.”

BlackLivesMatter does not mean only Black Lives Matter, but it emphasizes the “disproportionate violence Black folks experience”. In other words, blacks have experienced more or greater violence than other people have. One of the goals of the BML movement is to emphasize this.

This part of Ms Davis' defence is also a political message, not a message about the importance of blacks' self-esteem. Genuine and healthy self-esteem does not rest on our being “better” than others. Is Ms Davis suggesting that the only way blacks can have a good self-image is to emphasizing they are special by having suffered more than non-blacks?

The claim that blacks have suffered more than non-blacks seems to create a clear difference between blacks and the rest of the non-black population. While it is unlike some claims of difference, such as superior intelligence or cultural superiority, it is still a claim to another kind of difference, greater suffering. This approach is not unique to the BLM movement.

After WWII some Jewish leaders set up the Holocaust Museum to remember the many people killed by the NAZI regime. However from the outset they only recorded the deaths of Jewish victims. In fact the NAZIs killed communists, trade union leaders, homosexuals, the intellectually impaired, gypsies as well as millions of people in the Slavic countries like Poland, the Ukraine, and Russia. This is not to say there was no Holocaust of Jews. The point is that many more non-Jews were killed by the NAZIs than Jews. A memorial which only recognizes Jewish deaths singles them out as “special” or different in their suffering. Being different by having suffered more than others is still a way to say “We are Different from You”.

In the context of American history, there are others who might dispute the claim that blacks have suffered more than non-blacks. The indigenous people of what is now the United States died in large numbers after the arrival of the invaders from England, described as Pilgrims. Some of their suffering came from warfare and massacres, while new diseases may have killed even more.

The chief attraction of the New World for the Europeans was land. Landless peasants from Europe rushed to the New World for access to land. All of that land was taken from the indigenous people. Even the freed slaves in the South worked and lived on land their former masters had taken from the original inhabitants and were never given back. After the slaves were freed in the US the numbers of these former slaves increased steadily. However during that same time the number of indigenous people fell drastically. Can anyone doubt this happened because the original inhabitants were driven from the best land and forced to live in places the immigrants didn't want for themselves? So have blacks in the US actually suffered more than the indigenous people? In my view, the answer to this question is not obviously yes. Furthermore, how can we really answer such a question? Should we just add up the dead bodies on both sides? If we just count dead bodies, then the Jewish claim to greater suffering in WWII must be abandoned. More than 10 million slavs died at the hands of the NAZIS. So the apparently obvious claim than blacks have suffered more than non-blacks is really a highly contentious and probably impossible to justify as well.

Ms Davis particularly addresses those who would prefer 'AllLivesMatter' to 'BlackLivesMatter'. She says people advocating a slogan like 'AllLivesMatter' assume the pro-black slogan 'BlackLivesMatter' is directed against whites.

“When you take offense to a BlackLivesMatter protest because you believe they should be saying AllLivesMatter (or even WhiteLivesMatter) or when you take a direct offense to someone being "Pro-Black," it is presumptuous and telling of many things.
“First, it reveals the reinforcement of the white-black binary assumption - that is, if we are saying we are Pro-Black, that must mean we are anti-white.”

She insists people who prefer another slogan like 'AllLivesMatter' believe falsely that pro-black = anti-white, as if the only reason one could have for rejecting this slogan is by having this false belief. As explained above, to be against a healthy black self-identity would indeed be anti-black. There is nothing wrong with a healthy black self-identity. But there are serious doubts about identity politics, where having this or that personal identity means that you should support a given political movement. The heart of Ms Davis's claim is that if you are black or support blacks, you must accept only the 'BlackLivesMatter' political slogan. Any other slogan does not – she thinks – really support blacks, and so is evidence of white racism.

The reality is that 'BlackLivesMatter' is a political slogan which claims to advance the interests of black people in a political movement centered around people with a certain skin colour. The reason people - black and white - oppose the slogan because it is a political slogan based on the very same concepts as the segregationist policies of the past, and as we will see below does not really advance the interests of black people.

Few people have noticed that asserting there is a significant difference between people with darker skins and others revives the segregationist categories used to justify the need for special toilets and schools for blacks. You can only promote a different treatment for blacks if you think there is a real difference between blacks and everybody else.

Ms Davis uses this analogy to emphasize her point about how being pro-black is not anti-white:

“If I started a campaign for breast cancer awareness, would you then show up protesting the events because I did not talk about pancreatic or liver cancer? The answer is likely no.”

Of course the answer would be no. But this analogy is actually more revealing than she realizes. What if you used the slogan 'BlackBreastCancersMatter' in your campaign against breast cancer? This is not “anti-liver cancer” either, but it has the same problem as the 'BlackLivesMatter' slogan. Why should there be an emphasis on breast cancer in blacks? Why not 'BreastCancersMatter'?

Ms Davis seems to have forgotten one of the clever ways that the older policy of segregation was attacked. The story goes that a man who owned a segregated movie theatre was shown a line of people so arranged that at one end there was a perfect example of a “white” person and at the other end a perfect example of a “black” person. He was then challenged to show where he would draw the line between those he would admit into his theatre and those he would not. The fact that any such line would be arbitrary shows the use of the terms 'black' and 'white' as a way of distinguishing between people is itself arbitrary, relative and superficial. We all know black cars and white cars are basically the same. Does Ms Davis really think that people with different coloured skin are basically different? Who else thinks like that? The Klu Klux Klan.

There is absolutely no reason why we can't use a range of slogans to protest police violence. Do the police only kill blacks in the US? Are no whites, Chicanos, First Inhabitants, Chinese killed by police in the same way? They are all targets of police violence. So why not use slogans like 'StopPoliceViolence', 'StopPoliceKillings', 'StopPoliceMurder', 'JailPoliceKillers', etc? Why not? Because someone is trying to frame all anger, resentment and protest in KKK's segregationist language, the language of skin colour. It revives black vs white thinking long after the old segregationist institutions have died and been buried. And for good measure you are labelled a racist if you object to this plan to institute a divide and rule strategy devised by the rulers of the US.

The best and oldest method for conquerors to rule over a conquered people is to use the tactic of divide and rule. A study of the British Empire provides example after example. Tribe against tribe. Religion against religion. One ethnic group against another. Ms Davis realizes that white supremacy manifests in insidious ways. Unfortunately she has not managed to escape the insidious manifestation of white supremacy herself. Where do the concepts of “black” and “white” come from?

They originated hundreds of years ago when the British and other Europeans began enslaving the people of Africa and using them to work the land in the New World. Masters always need a way to distinguish themselves from the slaves. In the slave societies of Ancient Greece the Greek slaves were not thought of as humans, but as talking animals, which distinguished them from "dumb" animals like cattle or sheep. They were considered not to be intelligent because they could not speak Greek. They made “bar, bar” sounds and were call barbarians. The same kind of discrimination can be found today in the English class system. If you have the "wrong" accent there are some very well paid jobs you need not apply for. Skin colour in the Ancient World did not have the meaning it does today. This only became important with the rise of the African slave trade.


“Identity politics divide and fragment the debt-serf class into ethnic and religious silos that are propagandized into viewing each other as enemies rather than colleagues."(1)

Through constant exposure to messages from a media cartel owned by a small number of like-minded corporations, people hear themselves described as “whites”, “blacks”, “Mexican-Americans”, “Chicanos”, while the First Nations people, the American Indians, are completely ignored. The BML movement is successful precisely because it draws on these ready-made patterns of thinking which are seen by many as the “natural” way to understand themselves and others in their society.

While 'BlackLivesMatter' seems a “radical” slogan in the face of blatant criminal behaviour by police, in fact it accepts the traditional Them-and-Us discrimination which lies at the heart of the abuse most of us wish to condemn. Such abuse should be countered with 'AllLivesMatter' or similar slogans to avoid reinforcing the artificial differences that are used to distract us from our similarities.

“To think the lives of one group are of more importance than those not in that group divides those who are special, who deserve special attention, from those who are not.”(2)
“The truth is we have more in common with people of different ethnicity and religions than we can possibly know in a totalitarian system drenched in the divisive propaganda of identity politics.”(3)

Identity politics uses features of our identity to give us a political direction. For example, “in the U.S. both political parties deploy identity politics, but the Democrats in particular depend on the 'if you don't vote the Democratic ticket, you're a traitor to your race' line of propaganda.”(4) Real politics concentrates on economic issues, issues around social class. Our social class looks like just another thing about ourselves. People can be seen as, and think of themselves as black and working class, or white and working class. But there is a profound difference between your skin colour and your class. Your class position is determined by your place in the economic system, traditionally stated as your relations to the means of production. Your class is determined by your relations to others within that system. You are not born with it – like your genetic makeup – and if the system is changed then you no longer have that position.

When the slaves in the US were released about 150 years ago, their class position changed overnight while their skin colour did not. It is likely that their being slaves influenced many things about them, so there is a connection between their class position and other things about them, but these too can change and are not inherited like skin or eye colour.

Further, your class position is not like your religion. Your religion is often picked up from your parents or your community, but you on your own can change your religion, and over their lives some people do. Your class position cannot be chosen in the same way. You can't become a capitalist by simple “conversion”. You need money. You can't become a member of the working class by “conversion” either. There must be a capitalist around to offer you a job.

Some people can live their whole lives and have no real interest in their class position. If they have enough money and security perhaps it does not matter to them. Also people tend to think about enhancing their own position and not worry about the way the wider class system around them works. However in times of social crisis, when the structure of the class system harms more and more people, the only way this can be fought is to attack the class system itself. For this to happen those attacking the system must unite with as many of the people who also suffer from the structure of the system to force it to change.

It is here that a concern for personal identity needs to be expanded. “White” and “black” people need to realize that while they have different skin colours and different personal or family histories, nothing is going to change in their material circumstances unless they open up to the idea that they both are the same in their class position. In spite of their perceived differences, they must realize that they have a fundamentally common interest to protect and defend. In hard times, thinking your enemies are “white” or “black” will only perpetuate the class system which is destroying the lives of all working-class people, as well as many others who do not have the highest incomes. The US and all other countries in the “free world” are ruled by the super-rich through giant banks, corporations, hedge funds, etc. Until this changes, things will only get worse.


Some have argued that police killing of blacks has its beginnings in the US slave system. Of course there is some connection here, but this does not explain why it is getting much worse now, over 150 years later. What are the factors which explain why this is so much more common now that in 1960’s during the Civil Rights era?

It is easy to see why blacks and some whites see the increase in lawless police violence as “racist". However Chris Hedges has a different and more frightening view. With the decline in manufacturing which began in the 1970's, black and white workers have found it harder and harder to find jobs. This has led to an increasing number of “unnecessary” people who were not integrated into the regular workforce. As a result

“…the corporate state needed harsher mechanisms to subjugate a population it condemned as human refuse. Those on probation and parole or in jails or prisons grew from 780,000 in 1965 to 7 million in 2010. The kinds of federal crimes punishable by death leaped from one in 1974 to 66 in 1994, thanks to the Clinton administration. The lengths of prison sentences tripled and quadrupled. Laws were passed to turn inner-city communities into miniature police states. This had nothing to do with crime.”(5)

In other words, after 1970 when numbers of unemployed started to rise, the police and prison system ceased to be about “fighting crime” and became a system of social control. Hedges notes that in a book entitled “The First Civil Right: How Liberals Built Prison America”, Naomi Murkawa

“…documents how the series of 'reforms' enacted to professionalize police departments resulted in placing more money and resources into the hands of the police, giving them greater power to act with impunity and expanding legally sanctioned violence. All penal reform, from President Harry Truman’s 1947 Committee on Civil Rights report to the Safe Streets Act of 1968 to the Sentencing Reform Act of 1984 to contemporary calls for more professionalization, have, she notes, only made things worse.”(6)

More blacks are the victims of police violence because they experience more poverty, but whites should take no comfort from this. The legalized injustice they face will be used against whites as well when the social and economic conditions created by the ruling class deteriorate further:

State-administered violence is all that lies between the corporate state and widespread unrest. The power elites know it. They also know that as this unrest begins to define the white underclass, the legal and physical shackles perfected for poor people of color can easily be expanded. Rights in America have become privileges. And the corporate state has created legal mechanisms, including the loss of our right to privacy, to remove these privileges the instant it feels threatened.”(7)

There are four messages here, two for “blacks” and two for “whites”. The first message for blacks is that the current violence against them is not just motivated by racism, hatred of blacks. It is part of the institutionalized violence necessary for the 0.00001% to rule over all of us. It is not “personal”, not about them. The totally corrupt and greedy rulers of the US and the “West” need such violence to maintain their control in the US and overseas. Just protesting about “racist police violence” will never achieve its goal. As Hedges says The corporate state, until it is destroyed, will do what it is designed to do—kill with impunity. The state itself must be attacked, including the super-rich rulers of the state. The second message is that to destroy the corporate state, blacks must work together with whites and everyone else who will benefit from ending the rule of the super-rich.

The first message for whites is that they will be next. The illusion of thinking the violence is just directed against blacks could blind them to the reality that when the time comes, they will get the same treatment. And the second message for whites is the same as the second message for blacks. They can only improve their lives and the legal and political system of their country by working together with all who will benefit from the destruction of this state and building another.

This is the ultimate failing of the BLM movement. It is deliberately aimed at blacks, but on their own black protests against the police will not change anything. And since it is politically controlled by Soros and his agents, it can only be a tool of the super-rich in their war with the people of the US. What better way to deal with your “opposition” than to secretly determine their policies and actions? This will insure that they play right into your hands.

Two graphs can help us understand the social background behind the increasing police violence in the US. First we can look at the massive increase in the prison population since 1971 with the beginning of the “War on Drugs”.(8)

The second graph shows the distribution of income growth since 1993 in the US.(9) Over the three periods covered, the top 1% in the US has increased their income by about 10%. The rest of the population – including the “blacks” following the BLM movement – has seen their incomes stagnate to almost no increase from 2009-2012.

Furthermore according to Berkeley economics professor Emmanuel Saez 95% of income gains since 2009 have accrued to the top 1%. After 1995 the spending of those in the top 5% of income levels began to rise faster than the other 95% of the population. Then, about 2008 the spending of most in the US remained the same while the spending of the top 5% has continued to increase at about the same level.(10)

So why does George Soros and the monopoly media owners in the US want to promote “black” against “white” thinking?(11) Because it helps them direct ordinary people's dissatisfaction with their worsening financial position to other people in the same position as themselves. This will stop them directing their attention to the super-rich .00001% who are increasing their wealth at the expense of the 99%. As explained by Charles Hugh Smith:

“Identity politics eliminate the potential for class consciousness that crosses ethnic and religious boundaries. As noted yesterday in 'Our Impoverished, Pathological Society', 'race is not a significant determinant of social polarization in today's America. It is class that really matters'.”(12)

PS: This article was inspired by an event which took place in Adelaide on the 30th of July 2016. During a rally demanding an end to abuse of indigenous children in detention a few people started chanting 'BlackLivesMatter'. However an indigenous participant asked them to chant 'AllLivesMatter' instead, which they did.

PPS: A discussion of George Soros can be found at the end of my article:

Not 'Black Lives Matter' but 'ALL LIVES MATTER' http://australianvoice.livejournal.com/20603.html


“Four Reasons Why Being Pro-Black Isn't the Same as Being Anti-White” by Wazi Maret Davis

1. http://charleshughsmith.blogspot.com.au/2016/09/identity-politics-totalitarianism.html

2. Ibid.

3. Ibid.

4. Ibid.

5. http://www.truthdig.com/report/item/police_killings_wont_stop_20160925

6. Ibid.

7. http://www.truthdig.com/report/page2/police_killings_wont_stop_20160925

8. http://www.oftwominds.com/blogsept16/ill-society9-16.html

9. http://charleshughsmith.blogspot.com.au/2016/09/identity-politics-totalitarianism.html

10. Ibid.

11. http://charleshughsmith.blogspot.com.au/2016/09/identity-politics-totalitarianism.html.

12. Ibid. The article “Our Impoverished, Pathological Society” can be found here: http://www.oftwominds.com/blogsept16/ill-society9-16.html


"Yet many fear that this time the change may be so fast and so vast, and its impact so uneven and disruptive, that it may threaten not only individual livelihoods but the stability of society itself."

— Rafael Reif, President, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Member of the Board of Trustees, World Economic Forum*

Across the globe, hospitals sit empty as tens of thousands (hundreds of thousands is likely more accurate) healthcare workers/nurses are being furloughed as digitalization, the transition to Telehealth, mHealth, etc. advances in the background of a declared pandemic. In the Global South & South Asia, those that comprise the informal economy (market sellers, farmers, artisans, etc.), those with no financial security, face starvation. Across America and in Europe, the circumstances behind the horrific deaths of the elderly (that make up the majority of Covid deaths) in isolated/locked down "care" homes begin to be disclosed.

While this is happening, while all eyes are fixated on "the new war" on a virus, a new world is being rolled out. One that advances our dependence on technology, one that further disconnects us from the natural world - and each other. The Fourth Industrial Revolution (4IR) is the blurring of boundaries between the physical, digital, & biological. Blockchain, digital currency. A fusion in AI, robotics, IoT, genetic engineering.

This very push, at this very moment, is to roll out "smart cities". At this precise juncture, the ruling class, WEF/UN, global finance, et al. - are resetting the entire globe. A reset into a dystopian 4IR. A main component of "smart cities" is surveillance and accompanying technologies that promise a fully compliant citizenry. COVID19 is the conduit.

April 30 2020, United Nations ITU: "COVID-19, but also of the unique opportunity we are presented with to speed up the development of digital society. Having a new strategy for information and communication technology at the national and global level has now become more necessary than ever." This built on the commitment to leverage digital technologies made at the G20 Leaders' Extraordinary Summit on March 26, 2020). This is the acceleration of 5G – to implement "smart cities".

The 4IR cannot come into fruition without the 5G infrastructure that will run the Internet of Things. "Smart” cities" must be understood within the context of GLOBAL POLICING & the military industrial complex. Cybersecurity will be the battle space of the 21st century.

May 30 2019: "Scientists from 42 countries are now warning their governments about the emerging health problems associated... [with] 5G infrastructure..."

May 29 2019: "The Int. Society of Doctors for the Environment, its subsidiaries in 27 countries & more than 200 doctors & scientists are all calling for a STOP to be put to the roll out of 5G, 'due to concern that 5G radio frequency radiation will have adverse health effects."

So, surprise, they actually don't care about your health. The infrastructure for digitalized, IoT "learning" for children, global in scale, is already in place. "Listen to the science" - but only if the science advances the desires sought by the ruling class.

On March 26 2020 the Global Education Coalition was announced. Launched March 26 2020 "UNESCO & partners launched the Global Educational Coalition to develop solutions to make digital learning more inclusive... The Coalition consists of 90 public & private partners". Partners of the coalition include the World Bank, Facebook, Microsoft, Google, BBC, etc.The coalition is built on the premise that virtual "learning" will be long-term. Digital learning, already underway in cities such as New York, has resulted in those not participating to be reported to Children's services.

This follows the Microsoft "Partnership with UNICEF for refugee children education & protection" "developing a 'learning passport', a digital personalized, globally-accredited platform" which will reach 75 million children.

Microsoft joins Global Education Coalition by Satya Nadella, CEO Microsoft, April 30, 2020: "It is undeniable that the current global economy has entered the fourth stage of the industrial revolution or Industry 4.0..."

Data is the new oil. Biodiversity is nothing more than capital to be placed on the blockchain. There is a renewed push on climate change action. Building on the "nature is recovering" narrative, that we now have an opportunity to embrace and build upon, under the pretext of solving climate change. All media-fed, NGO-led, influencer & celebrity endorsed climate "action" - is the mobilization/obtaining of social license for smart cities to roll out across globe. C40 Cities (Bloomberg, Clinton) has announced the newly launched Global Mayors Covid-19 Recovery Task Force. If you search this, you will find this announcement promoted by Smart City websites. Media stories promote excellent ideas such as roads being converted into bike lanes – in order to mobilize/build momentum and social licence – intentionally omitting any/all references to the global pursuit of 5G ("smart cities") being advanced at breakneck speed. The irony is that the excellent ideas highlighted – none of them require 5G/"smart cities" to be implemented.

There is a silver lining in this. Although collectively we are very late to the game, 5G must be implemented at the municipal levels of government. This is why the focus will now shift to cities now partnered / attached to global aspirations of ruling class/ corporate power, with C40 Cities & the Global Covenant of Mayors. Yet citizens have far better access to and oversight over the municipal level of government. Organized, face to face, radical resistance in communities belonging to cities, villages and towns, could defeat 5G from going ahead. But there is no time to waste. We must organize now – and quickly if we are to stop it.

Jan 10, 2020, World Economic Forum: "5G networks were rolled out in 2019 and will expand rapidly in 2020... The global deployment of 5G networks got a running start in 2019 and is set to rapidly expand beyond anything we expected a year ago."

And it does not stop there despite the dangers outlined by doctors & scientists, approx ten years after 5G in fully implemented, a more powerful version is to makes its debut.

Oct 17 2019, Scientific American: "As a society, should we invest hundreds of billions of dollars deploying 5G, a cellular technology that requires the installation of 800,000 or more new cell antenna sites in the U.S. close to where we live, work and play?

Instead, we should support the recommendations of the 250 scientists and medical doctors who signed the 5G Appeal that calls for an immediate moratorium on the deployment of 5G and demand that our government fund the research needed to adopt biologically based exposure limits that protect our health and safety."


Jan 10, 2020: 5G is about to change the world in ways we can't even imagine yet


April 30, 2020: Broadband/Network | ICT4SDG | Infrastructure | Policy/ Regulatory Reform | Regulation


"The Global Education Coalition launched by UNESCO seeks to facilitate inclusive learning opportunities for children and youth during this period of sudden and unprecedented educational disruption."


11 Mayors Unite to Lead Global Mayors COVID-19 Recovery Task Force


*I have received a copy of a statement by Rafael Reif, President, Massachusetts Institute of Technology. I assume it is authentic and readers should feel free to prove it is not authentic if they can. I take it as a important warning for us apparently from someone who should know what is in the pipeline for the whole world. Even it is not from Rafael Reif, it is a good summary of concerns shared by many about the mad rush into 5G technology.

PLANDEMIC: Interview With Whistleblower Who Worked in US Bioweapons Labs

This video has been taken down by YouTube but it is so important now that I have used it here without permission of the people who made it. (I don't think they will complain.)

The first nine minutes of the interview discuss the background of the speaker, Dr Judy Mikovitz, a molecular biologist who has worked for decades in this field, including spending time at Fort Detrick dealing with Ebola. She was arrested and hounded out of her field after publishing an article which showed that anaimal and human foetal tissues in vaccines caused many chronic diseases. She is not against all vaccines. Her job has been to develop vaccines. Her view is that theFauchi/Gates vaccines are very dangerous and ineffective.

The next 15 minutes looks at the Covid-19 situation now and its history going back to the 1980s. She claims (among other things):

There is no vaccines for any RNA virus that works.
Covid-19 was studied and manipulated in a lab.
Dr Fauchi was connected to this Covid-19 research.
Using a ventilator for Covid-19 patients kills them. It is the wrong treatment.
The game is to prevent the use of effective therapies until everyone is infected and then push the vaccines KNOWING THAT FLU VACCINES INCREASE THE ODDS BY 36% OF GETTING COVID-19.
Our immune system is improved by touching. Government recommendations W/R to Covid-19 are medically the wrong things to do.

Dr Judy Mikovitz - molecular biologist published an article in Science which showed that animal and human fetal tissues in vaccines caused many chronic diseases. Her reputation was destroyed, she was held in jail with no charges, driven into bankruptcy and put on a gag order. Gag order has been lifted so she has written a book Plague of Corruption and now appears on this 26 minute video. Fauchi directed the coverup and paid people off.

She explains how Fauchi and others intervened in AIDS investigations (sealing the work of a French research team) and giving an unpublished paper to Robert Gallo so he could claim credit for the discovery. There was a delay which allowed them to work on patents so the right people got the money from the discovery. They also pushed therapy in the wrong direction by using their own drug.

She also draws attention to an law in the US which in effect privatizes the work of people working for a university or the government. So the proceeds of the discovery goes to the researcher/company instead of the University or government who paid for the person doing the work. This led to the end of "independent" science as individuals and companies could work together to develop profitable drugs.

There is no vaccines for any RNA virus that works. She is not against vaccines. Her job is to develop vaccines. The problem is that Fauchi/Gates vaccines are very dangerous and ineffective. Virus was studied and manipulated in a lab. It is not a virus that has occurred naturally. Occurred between North Carolina labs, Fort Detrick and Wuhan Virology Institute and Fauchi was connected to this Covid-19 research.
In 1999 she worked at Fort Detrick on to "teach" Ebola how how to infect humans without killing them.

Discusses the irresponsible and indiscriminate use of a Covid-19 diagnosis. Difference between dying WITH an infection and dying OF an infection. Doctors/hospitals are being given money ($13,000) for covid diagnosis and $39,000 if they are put on a ventilator. THE VENTILATOR KILLS THEM. WRONG TREATMENT.

Italians got an new, untested vaccine at the beginning of 2019.
Hydroxychloroquine is the best medication for Covid-19 but it has been attacked by Fauchi and others. (AMA said doctors could loose their license if they used it.) Older effective anti-autism drug has been withdrawn.

The game is to prevent effective therapy until everyone is infected and push the vaccines knowing that flu vaccines increase the odds buy 36% of getting Covid-19.

Immune response COMES FROM TOUCHING as interaction with others. When lockdown - which lowers your immune response - ends this means the incidence of the infection WILL GO UP = THE SECOND WAVE.

The recommendations by most govts ARE ALL WRONG. (eg. Close beaches.)

No dissenting voices since 2011. Since the 80s people like Fauchi and the pharma industry have controlled the funding for research and opportunity for publication in the journals. Medical professionals have been misled by this system.

Speculations on the Politics of the Coronavirus in the People's Republic of China

This is a Guest Blog by Denis Churilov

A Few Thoughts on the Current Coronavirus Outbreak

I’m not really sure whether it’s true or not, but some people who monitor China are saying that local Wuhan city and Hubei province authorities shut down the transportation routes and put the city under strict quarantine without really discussing it with the Central Committee of the Communist Party. They did it on their own, apparently.

Hubei province is a large transportation hub that plays a vital role in connecting different regions of China through railroad services and highways. Lots of traded goods normally go through there. Wuhan, by the way, is the 5th or the 6th largest city in the People’s Republic of China, located in the central part of the country, and it has a huge strategic and economic significance.

And to imagine that local authorities would order to shut everything down and quarantine the entire megapolis without coordinating it with the central government is rather strange, especially considering the fact that it happened when there were only, like, 6-12 registered death cases by then (maybe they knew something that we don’t? who knows).

Imagine shutting down all the airports and all the train stations in Melbourne, or New York City, with all the adjacent suburbs and major metropolitan areas, because of a dozen elderly people who died from some flu-like virus. No-one would allow that.

It’s quite interesting that the World Health Organisation, form the very beginning, had been very reluctant to declare global public heath emergency, and it only did so recently.

Further, president Xi Jinping only called an emergency government meeting on the 25th of January, weeks after Wuhan was officially quarantined, which further supports the assertion that the decision to cut one of the China’s most strategic trade/transportation hubs was made without his involvement.

Many of you might have heard that in November last year, in Davos, Switzerland, there was an exercise simulation codenamed “Event 201”, carried out jointly by the Johns Hopkins Centre for Health Security, World Economic Forum, and Bill & Melinda Gates foundation. The purpose of the simulation was to predict developments in case of a hypothetical deadly disease outbreak and to design strategies to isolate the spread of pathogen, as well as to minimise the impact on the global economy.
Also, what fewer people noticed is that, in early December last year, about three weeks before the reports of the new coronavirus began to surface, Xi and the high ranking members of the Politburo were discussing measures to boost national emergency management...

The new coronavirus outbreak happened right before the Lunar New Year, an annual event that causes World’s largest inner migration flows, with large masses of East-Asian people visiting relatives, going on holidays, and such.
And, again, the measures taken by the local authorities in Hubei province to limit the spread of the virus have been unprecedented. The levels of alertness have been truly impressive. Nothing like this has ever happened in recent Chinese history.

It could be safely assumed that the Chinese authorities have learned from the past cases of epidemic spread, and that the emergency response protocols have been strengthened, in part due to Xi’s plea to improve them in December 2019, as well as due to the international simulations carried out in Switzerland a few months prior, which were taken into consideration by the Chinese authorities, hence the response could be interpreted by some as “overreaction”.

We can also safely assume that both the “Event 201” simulation and Xi’s December 2019 emergency services plea are two completely unrelated events, and that all the other factors, such as virus outbreak happening right before the Lunar New Year, are just a series of tragic coincidences. It could as well be a coincidence, we can’t tell at this stage.

However, if we assume that it’s not all a conscience, then we can speculate that something is rotten in the state of Denmark... I mean the People’s Republic of China.

It’s not a big secret that there are multiple powerful factions and cliques within the Chinese elites who have been fighting for power over decades. Like, there is Shanghai clique (Jiang Zemin was a prominent member), different power groups in Beijing, the elites of Guangdong province, which is a major international trade hub with multiple sea ports - the part of China which is heavily dependent of international trade (they trade with Taiwan, South Korea, Japan, the United States, and are generally integrated into the global economic system). There are many powerful groups within the Communist Party who have been suffering a lot due to the Sino-American trade wars, and who oppose Xi Jinping’s efforts to develop domestic markets and to make China economically self-sufficient, thus annulling the importance of international trade in many sectors, where some people have been making billions over the years.

Taking all of that into consideration, it wouldn’t be completely unreasonable to assume that there are some serious domestic, inter-regional power games happening in China right now, with some factions actively trying to destabilise the political situation within the PRC (perhaps even in collaboration with foreign powers) in order to undermine Xi and the people who stand behind him.

That may, in part, explain, the apparent overreaction to the coronavirus (which might have been artificially released, either by Chinese themselves or in coordination with their Western partners from Washington and Davos), the quarantine measures, the panic inducing media hysteria, the shutting down of strategic transportation routes, and such - all of that could serve to sow distrust in the central government and to boost the protest moods and movements inside China, as well as to, perhaps, cut Xi and his clique from certain financial and administrative resources, and to demonstrate to him that he doesn’t fully control the situation.

Those people are far from being stupid, they usually have enough power, connections and cunningness to be able to weave complex plots and conspire on international level to achieve their goals.

Also, add to this this fact that the school and University holidays have now been extended, so all these young Chinese students will have more free time to walk around, make videos and post social media entries about how bad everything is, how there’s shortage of food, how the government doesn’t do anything (or, on the contrary, how it takes away their freedom). There will be more unverifiable reports going around on social media about government hiding something, saying that the real death toll is in the millions, and so on. Many people seek sensationalism.

They are going to wind up each other with rumours and exaggerations to the point when it becomes easier to organise them into coherent protest movements for a regime change. It just happens that young University students are often very energetic, they have lots of free time, and they are very susceptible to “Western propaganda” that consists of platitudes about “freedom” and “democracy”, hence they have been used as key tools in destabilising systems with mass-protests in various regime change operations all around the world, ranging from “Euromaidan” riots in Ukraine to the infamous “Arab Spring” events - none of that ever ends up good.

So it’s quite possible that someone is brewing another Tienanmen Square Protests to oust Xi’s clique in order to take his place, sacrificing lots of regular people in the process and, potentially, starting disintegration processes in China that will most likely lead to a civil war with death tolls measured in millions (note that what is happening now is happening with the global economic recession getting worse and worse in the background). And coronavirus is just a convenient excuse to inconvenience the public economically and to spread the panic in order to stimulate the protest movements. Whether or not the disease outbreak happened naturally or was released on purpose (with the virus being bio-engineered; both Chinese and Western intelligence agencies have resources to do so) is of little importance in such case.

Of course, all of what I have written above is nothing but theories and speculations, so please don’t take it too seriously.

And for those of you who would like the possibility of events developing in such a way (there are many openly and secretly xenophobic people who dislike Chinese beyond the criticism of their government, indulging in secret fantasies about some disaster killing off hundreds of millions of Asians) - I wouldn’t be that enthusiastic if I were you. If shit really hits the fan, and the Chinese government begins to fall, with different regions engaging each other in a full-scale civil war with multi-million death tolls, the global waves of disastrous economic resonance will hit you and your families much harder than any viral pandemic, whether natural or engineered.